Skip to main content
· 8/15/1995

Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. v. Merrell Williams

Citations

  • 62 F.3d 408
  • 314 U.S. App. D.C. 85
  • 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 22014
  • 1995 WL 478207

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that, in cases where nonparty lawmakers moved to quash subpoenas based on legislative privilege, “the only question was whether the subpoenas inquired into legislative conduct”
  • explaining that the privilege applies “when the action complained of falls within the legislative sphere”
  • explaining that, in cases where nonparty lawmakers moved to quash subpoenas based on legislative privilege, “the only question was whether the subpoenas inquired into legislative conduct”
  • quashing subpoenas for disclosure of subcommittee documents served on members of a Congressional subcommittee by private defendants in an unrelated civil lawsuit
  • quashing subpoenas for disclosure of subcommittee documents served on members of a Congressional subcommittee by private defendants in an unrelated civil lawsuit
  • removing only the enforceability of the subpoena to federal court, not the whole case

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Silberman, Henderson, Tatel

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.