Jacques v. Jacques

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• requiring written findings of fact under section 61.08(1) without discussing the distinction between the two statutes

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Kennedy v. Kennedy
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-07-23· cited 43×
• Milo v. Milo
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-09-25· cited 15×
• Swanston v. Swanston
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-12-16· cited 12×
• Dal Ponte v. Dal Ponte
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-04-28· cited 8×
• Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Lupica
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-09-08· cited 2×
• U.S. Bank National Ass'n v. Bjeljac
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-09-08· cited 2×
• Collins v. Collins
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-05-09· cited 2×
• In Re the Marriage of Cooper
  Court of Appeals of Iowa· 1994-08-25· cited 1×
• US BANK NAT. ASS'N v. Bjeljac
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-09-08

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Boynton v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1985-03-27· cited 47×
• State v. Boynton
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1985-11-07· cited 30×
• RBS v. Capri
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1980-05-27· cited 12×
• Allison v. Allison
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1989-12-15· cited 4×