Allison v. Allison

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• possibility, at time of dissolution, that enactment of new tax law could reduce husband's income did not constitute knowledge that there would be substantial change in circumstances
• \A possibility that income will decrease is not knowledge that it will do so.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Rosen v. Rosen
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1997-04-24· cited 318×
• Jacques v. Jacques
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-11-19· cited 9×
• Mendes v. Mendes
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-02-21· cited 7×
• Dogoda v. Dogoda
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2017-12-06

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• DePoorter v. DePoorter
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1987-06-12· cited 42×
• McIntyre v. McIntyre
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1983-07-14· cited 28×
• Kuse v. Kuse
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1988-10-18· cited 24×
• Penland v. Penland
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1983-12-16· cited 8×