California Court of Appeal· 3/3/2000
Jacobus v. Krambo Corp.
Citations
- 93 Cal. Rptr. 2d 425
- 78 Cal. App. 4th 1096
- 2000 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1810
- 2000 Daily Journal DAR 2433
- 2000 Cal. App. LEXIS 159
- 82 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 215
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[T]he risk that one worker may accuse another of sexual harassment to deflect an adverse performance review is a risk inherent in employment, analogous to the risk . . . that one worker may assault another in a job-related dispute.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Haning
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
27 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Freund v. Nycomed AmershamNinth Circuit· 2003-10-21· cited 185×
- Gattuso v. Harte-Hanks Shoppers, Inc.California Supreme Court· 2007-11-05· cited 126×
- United States v. SteinS.D. New York· 2006-06-26· cited 42×
- Davis v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2016-03-28· cited 41×
- Cassady v. MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLPCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2006-11-29· cited 40×
- Myers v. Trendwest Resorts, Inc.California Court of Appeal· 2007-02-28· cited 34×
- In Re Work Uniform CasesCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2005-10-11· cited 27×
- Boyer v. JensenCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2005-05-12· cited 23×
- Thornton v. California Unemployment Insurance Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2012-04-17· cited 21×
- Plancarte v. Guardsmark, LLC.California Court of Appeal· 2004-05-12· cited 20×
- Sherman v. American Water Heater Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee· 2001-02-27· cited 19×
- Takacs v. AG Edwards and Sons, Inc.S.D. California· 2006-08-02· cited 18×
- United States v. SteinS.D. New York· 2007-07-16· cited 15×
- County of Kern v. SparksCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2007-03-02· cited 15×
- Nicholas Laboratories v. ChenCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2011-10-12· cited 11×
- Rudebeck v. PaulsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2000-06-27· cited 9×
- People v. ShortCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2008-03-04· cited 9×
- Villalpando v. Exel Direct Inc.N.D. California· 2016-05-20· cited 6×
- McMaster v. Coca-Cola Bottling Co. of CaliforniaN.D. California· 2005-02-04· cited 5×
- Lopez v. RouttCalifornia Court of Appeals, 5th District· 2017-11-29· cited 4×
Cites
17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Mary M. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court· 1991-09-05· cited 385×
- Lisa M. v. Henry Mayo Newhall Memorial HospitalCalifornia Supreme Court· 1995-12-26· cited 193×
- Farmers Insurance Group v. County of Santa ClaraCalifornia Supreme Court· 1995-12-06· cited 188×
- Perez v. Van Groningen & Sons, Inc.California Supreme Court· 1986-06-23· cited 164×
- Rodgers v. Kemper Construction Co.California Court of Appeal· 1975-08-12· cited 142×
- Bay Development, Ltd. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court· 1990-05-31· cited 115×
- Carr v. Wm. C. Crowell Co.California Supreme Court· 1946-07-30· cited 108×
- Alma W. v. Oakland Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1981-08-28· cited 76×
- Dewitt v. Western Pacific Railroad CompanyNinth Circuit· 1983-11-09· cited 59×
- Bear Creek Planning Committee v. Title Insurance & Trust Co.California Court of Appeal· 1985-02-25· cited 45×
- Los Angeles Police Protective League v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1994-07-29· cited 40×
- JEFFREY E. v. Central Baptist ChurchCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1988-01-07· cited 35×
- DeMirjian v. Ideal Heating Corp.California Court of Appeal· 1954-12-23· cited 32×
- Devereaux v. Latham & WatkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1995-03-06· cited 31×
- Grissom v. Vons Companies, Inc.California Court of Appeal· 1991-11-21· cited 26×
- Douglas v. Los Angeles Herald-ExaminerCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1975-08-05· cited 23×
- Otis Elevator Co. v. TODA CONSTRUCTION OF CA.California Court of Appeal· 1994-08-01· cited 13×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.