Grissom v. Vons Companies, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[T]he obvious purpose of [section 2802] is to protect employees from suffering expenses in direct consequence of doing their jobs.”
• “Necessity is by nature a question of fact . . . accordingly, 24 ascertaining what was a necessary expenditure will require an inquiry into what was reasonable under 25 the circumstances”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).