Jacobs v. Jacobs

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “A modification of an original order is proper if the petitioner has proven unanticipated, intervening circumstances, fraud, impossibility of performance or unconscionable advantage.”
• trial court must state facts essential to the disposition of the issues properly before the court
• court may modify original decree if petitioner shows substantial change of circumstances

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Martin
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1985-04-30· cited 58×
• Richard v. Richard
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1985-09-13· cited 41×
• Ainsworth v. Ainsworth
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1990-03-16· cited 26×
• Roy v. Mugford
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1994-04-08· cited 20×
• Garrow v. Garrow
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1988-09-30· cited 15×
• Goshy v. Morey
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1987-12-18· cited 15×
• Schnabel v. Nordic Toyota, Inc.
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1998-10-02· cited 14×
• Sutton v. Sutton
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1987-02-13· cited 10×
• Richwagen v. Richwagen
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1987-12-15· cited 8×
• Bucholt v. Bucholt
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1989-08-04· cited 8×
• Isham v. Isham
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1989-10-20· cited 7×
• Sylvia v. Sylvia
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1986-02-28· cited 4×

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Braine v. Braine
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1968-06-04· cited 26×
• Jensen v. Jensen
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1981-06-02· cited 26×
• Ohland v. Ohland
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1982-02-04· cited 23×
• Cliche v. Cliche
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1982-02-02· cited 17×
• American Trucking Associations, Inc. v. Conway
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1982-09-07· cited 10×