Skip to main content

Cliche v. Cliche

Citations

  • 442 A.2d 60
  • 140 Vt. 540
  • 1982 Vt. LEXIS 444

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that husband failed to prove that reduction in income was involuntary when evidence failed to show change in his mental or physical health
  • party seeking to modify a decree based on stipulation “must make ‘especially explicit exposition’ ”
  • despite reduced salary and increased living expenses of obligor, and increase salary of obligee, modification not granted because obligor voluntarily changed circumstances
  • reduction of alimony not justified where defendant terminated one of his jobs voluntarily because he wanted more time to himself
  • in modification proceeding, trial court’s findings of facts will not be set aside unless, taking the evidence in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, and excluding the effect of modifying evidence, the findings are clearly erroneous

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Barney, C. J., and Billings, Hill, Underwood and Peck

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.