Jacobs v. Jacobs

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that a gift is not considered income for purposes of support calculations
• “A gift is not given in exchange for services, so it does not fit into the statutory definition of income.”
• “[I]f the failure to comply with the rules of appellate procedure does not impede review of the issues or prejudice the parties, we will address the merits of the appeal.” (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Suzanne D. v. Stephen W.
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2013-04-22· cited 22×
• Reilly v. Ernst & Young, LLP
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2007-07-18· cited 19×
• Frame v. Frame
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2009-06-23
• Dolinar v. Kapton
  Alleghany County Court of Common Pleas· 2006-03-10

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Estate of Haiko v. McGinley
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2002-05-15· cited 140×
• White v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas, Corp.
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1995-10-30· cited 58×
• Samii v. Samii
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2004-04-07· cited 51×
• Humphreys v. DeRoss
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2002-02-20· cited 45×
• Hutchison by Hutchison v. Luddy
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1992-07-02· cited 45×
• Anzalone v. Anzalone
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2003-10-28· cited 40×
• Lobaugh v. Lobaugh
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2000-05-30· cited 26×
• Philadelphia Contributionship Insurance v. Shapiro
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2002-05-08· cited 24×
• Hein v. Hein
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1998-09-21· cited 19×
• Marra v. Marra
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2003-08-28· cited 11×