Jackson v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that, because challenged identification procedure was not impermissibly suggestive, court need not analyze whether it resulted in “substantial likelihood of misidentification”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Ledesma v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 8th Dist. (El Paso)· 1992-04-08· cited 18×
• People v. Gee
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2001-09-28· cited 11×
• Watson, Levelle v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2005-08-16
• Danny Ray Whitfield v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2011-08-16

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Neil v. Biggers
  Supreme Court· 1972-12-06· cited 7,056×
• Simmons v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1968-03-18· cited 6,700×
• Manson v. Brathwaite
  Supreme Court· 1977-06-16· cited 5,119×
• Webb v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1988-11-09· cited 442×
• Williams v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1984-07-11· cited 129×
• Jackson v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1983-09-21· cited 121×
• Jackson v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1982-03-03· cited 96×