Skip to main content

Jackson v. State

Citations

  • 43 Tex. 421

Syllabus

<p>1. Offering to bribe witness—Evidence.—When an offer to bribe a witness with money is shown on the trial of one charged under Paschal’s Dig., art. 1934, it is not necessary to a conviction that the State should prove that the money was either actually tendered or produced.</p> <p>2. Same.—To sustain a conviction for offering to bribe a witness it is not necessary for the indictment to allege that an indictment had been found for the criminal charge about which it was expected the witness might testify, or that a subpoena or other process had issued for the witness.</p> <p>3. Indictment.—See indictment held sufficient for offering to bribe a witness.</p>

Judges: Devine

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.