Jackson v. State
Citations
- 43 Tex. 421
Syllabus
<p>1. Offering to bribe witness—Evidence.—When an offer to bribe a witness with money is shown on the trial of one charged under Paschal’s Dig., art. 1934, it is not necessary to a conviction that the State should prove that the money was either actually tendered or produced.</p> <p>2. Same.—To sustain a conviction for offering to bribe a witness it is not necessary for the indictment to allege that an indictment had been found for the criminal charge about which it was expected the witness might testify, or that a subpoena or other process had issued for the witness.</p> <p>3. Indictment.—See indictment held sufficient for offering to bribe a witness.</p>
Judges: Devine
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
13 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Ex Parte McWilliamsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1982-05-12· cited 259×
- Hendrix v. StateTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2004-11-16· cited 87×
- Drake v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1985-02-27· cited 85×
- Arnold v. StateTex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 2001-06-27· cited 29×
- State v. BallerWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1885-06-27· cited 19×
- Gammel v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1933-04-19· cited 7×
- Henderson v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky· 1919-10-03· cited 4×
- Lionel D. Murphy Jr. v. StateTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2002-10-24
- Hendrix, William Curtis v. StateTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2004-11-16
- Kendall v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1880-07-01
- Foster v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1881-07-01
- Brown v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1883-01-24
- Scoggins v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1885-05-27
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.