Skip to main content

Jackson v. State

Citations

  • 751 A.2d 473
  • 358 Md. 612
  • 2000 Md. LEXIS 246

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that the Circuit Court’s denial of Petitioner’s motion for a new trial while her appeal from her convictions was pending did not interfere with the subject matter on appeal
  • concluding that the Circuit Court's denial of Petitioner's motion for a new trial while her appeal from her convictions was pending did not interfere with the subject matter on appeal
  • holding that the circuit court erred in denying a motion for new trial on the basis of newly discovered evidence where the court denied the defendant’s motion without a hearing
  • stating that, “our adherence to the more general principle that the rules of practice and procedure adopted by this Court are to be strictly followed ... ”
  • alluding to the “clear and direct” section in Maryland Rule 4-331 requiring a hearing on a motion for new trial
  • discussing the burden of obtaining a new trial based on newly discovered testimony

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wilner

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

23 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

32 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.