Jackson v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a claim attacking a sexual predator designation may not be raised under rule 3.850 or rule 3.800(a)
• affirming the trial court's order denying Jackson's sexual predator designation challenge as improperly raised in a motion for postconviction relief
• claim that trial court erred in designating a defendant as a sexual predator could not be raised pursuant to either the rule governing motion to correct sentence or rule governing motions for post-conviction relief

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Saintelien v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2008-08-28· cited 26×
• King v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-09-28· cited 23×
• Kidd v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-10-03· cited 13×
• Jackson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-02-23· cited 3×
• Anderson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-11-17· cited 2×
• Czetli v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-08-08

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Angell v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-05-29· cited 17×
• Lee v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-12-05· cited 1×