Czetli v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding franchise relationship where half of plaintiffs gross annual sales were attributable to relationship with defendant
• regarding phrase ‘‘substantially associated,’’ ‘‘the word ‘substantially’ depicts the level of association required in order to create a franchise’’ (emphasis omit- ted)
• affirming trial court’s decision, which emphasized “the public policy of Connecticut to promote fairness among businesses behind the franchise act”
• termination of franchise without good cause violated Franchise Act and CUTPA by offending public policy of promoting fairness among businesses
• “[A] trial court . . . must apply an objective standard when determining whether the defendant had good cause to terminate an agreement.”
• Connecticut “[Franchise [A]ct’s remedial purpose, to prevent a franchisor from unfairly exerting economic leverage over a franchisee, indicates that the statute should be read broadly in favor of the plaintiff’

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).