Skip to main content

Jackson v. State

Citations

  • 160 S.W.3d 568
  • 2005 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 568
  • 2005 WL 858047

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that trial court did not abuse its discretion in declining to submit lesser-included offense to jury
  • holding that a trial court has the discretion to determine whether evidence of mental illness is relevant to negate the element of mens rea and, if admitted, whether such evidence raises the issue of a lesser-included offense
  • stating that we review a trial court’s decision not to submit a lesser-included-offense instruction for abuse of discretion
  • recognizing diminished capacity as a failure-of-proof defense in which a defendant claims the State failed to prove that the defendant had the required mental state
  • stating that we review a trial court’s decision not to submit a lesser- included-offense instruction for abuse of discretion
  • noting that legislature had made sudden passion a punishment issue instead of an affirmative defense to the crime

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Meyers, Keller, Price, Johnson, Holcomb, Cochran, Keasler, Hervey, Womack

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

161 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.