Skip to main content

Jackson v. Lajaunie

Citations

  • 270 So. 2d 859
  • 264 La. 181

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reasoning that the term “in connection with” is broader than “arising out of” and is equivalent to the terms “linked,” “associated with,” or “related to”
  • “Since the petition alleged the facts, and the facts showed that coverage was excluded, there was no obligation on the part of [the insurer] to defend [the insured’s] claim.”
  • “ ‘[i]n connection with’ is a broader term than ‘arising out of the use of the premises for the purposes’ of a service station” in context of homeowner’s policy
  • employee playing “practical joke” with gun, practical joke held not a “business pursuit”
  • “any act or omission in connection with the premises” is a broader exclusion than “arising out of the use of the premises for the purposes of a service station,” and bars coverage of a handgun accident that occurred on the uninsured premises

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dixon

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

44 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Jackson v. Lajaunie

4 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.