Coregis Insurance Company v. American Health Foundation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the phrase “related to” tends to be “defined more broadly and is not necessarily tied to the concept of a causal connection”
• explaining that the duty to defend “is measured solely by whether the complaints against the insured allege facts that, if proven true, would present a claim within the scope of the policy’s coverage.”
• defining the intransitive verb \use\ as \to put into action or service: have recourse to or enjoyment of\
• discussing “related to” as broader than “arising out of” where contract provision uses both terms
• defining the intransitive verb “use” as “to put into action or service: have recourse to or enjoyment of’
• interpreting the term “related to” in the context of an insurance contract” by explaining that “related to” is broader than “arising out of,” and does not require a causal connection

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).