Jackson v. Chandler

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that Arizona has significant interest in regulating conduct within its borders and deterring future tortious conduct
• applying Arizona state law in conflict of laws “significant relationship” analysis under the Restatement (Second) of Conflicts of Laws
• applying Arizona state law in conflict of laws \significant relationship\ analysis under the Restatement (Second) of Conflicts of Laws
• “[T]he basic policies underlying tort law [are] to deter wrongful conduct and compensate victims.” (quoting DeLoach v. Alfred, 192 Ariz. 28, 960 P.2d 628, 633 (1998))
• that incident occurred in other state does not lessen Arizona’s interest in applying its substantive laws
• “[W]e believe Arizona has a substantial interest in permitting the present action in this forum even though no party is a domiciliary of Arizona.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).