Jackson v. Brinker

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• acknowledging that Rule 45 pro vides a party several distinct means of resisting a subpoena duces tecum
• stating that interest in institutional security is a well-recognized federal common law privilege
• “[t]he scope of material obtained by a Rule 45 subpoena is as broad as permitted under the discovery rules ... if the material is relevant, not privileged, and is, or is likely to lead to, admissible evidence, it is obtainable by way of a subpoena.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Graham v. Casey's General Stores
  S.D. Indiana· 2002-03-18· cited 61×
• Keplinger v. Virginia Electric & Power Co.
  West Virginia Supreme Court· 2000-07-14· cited 43×
• Noble Roman's, Inc. v. Hattenhauer Distributing Co.
  S.D. Indiana· 2016-03-24· cited 30×
• Stout v. Illinois Farmers Insurance
  S.D. Indiana· 1993-08-31· cited 23×
• Golitko v. Indiana Department of Correction
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1999-05-21· cited 10×
• WM High Yield v. O'HANLON
  S.D. Indiana· 2006-02-17· cited 7×
• Union Carbide Corp. v. State Board of Tax Commissioners
  S.D. Indiana· 1993-12-08· cited 3×
• Resource Investments, Inc. v. United States
  Federal Claims· 2011-03-17· cited 2×
• Stanley, Terry Andrew
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 2015-09-16

Cites

24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Erie Railroad v. Tompkins
  Supreme Court· 1938-04-25· cited 18,491×
• Kerr v. United States Dist. Court for Northern Dist. of Cal.
  Supreme Court· 1976-06-14· cited 2,854×
• Young v. United States Ex Rel. Vuitton Et Fils S. A.
  Supreme Court· 1987-05-26· cited 815×
• Walker v. City of Birmingham
  Supreme Court· 1967-06-12· cited 621×
• Henry W. Kerr v. United States District Court for the Northern District of California, John Van Geldern, Real Parties in Interest
  Ninth Circuit· 1975-05-27· cited 339×
• Kelly v. City of San Jose
  N.D. California· 1987-02-26· cited 228×
• United States v. Moreno L. Keplinger, Paul L. Wright, and James B. Plank
  Seventh Circuit· 1985-10-29· cited 178×
• United States of America and William C. McCormick Special Agent, Irs v. J. Martin Lawless
  Seventh Circuit· 1983-06-10· cited 159×
• American Civil Liberties Union of Mississippi, Inc., Plaintiffs v. Cliff Finch, Governor of the State of Mississippi
  Fifth Circuit· 1981-03-13· cited 124×
• Fisher v. Marubeni Cotton Corp.
  Eighth Circuit· 1975-12-04· cited 66×
• In Re L. Joyce Hampers
  First Circuit· 1981-05-20· cited 53×
• In the Matter of the Special April 1977 Grand Jury. Appeal of William J. Scott, Witness
  Seventh Circuit· 1978-08-11· cited 42×
• Dallas L. Holifield v. United States
  Seventh Circuit· 1990-07-26· cited 41×
• Dixon v. 80 Pine Street Corp.
  Second Circuit· 1975-05-14· cited 21×
• Schafer v. Parkview Memorial Hospital, Inc.
  N.D. Indiana· 1984-05-23· cited 15×
• Desmond v. Hachey
  D. Maine· 1970-07-21· cited 15×
• Government Suppliers Consolidating Services, Inc. v. Bayh
  S.D. Indiana· 1990-06-20· cited 11×
• Waste Conversion, Inc. v. Rollins Environmental Services (NJ), Inc.
  Third Circuit· 1990-01-11· cited 10×
• Pigman v. Evansville Press
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1989-05-08· cited 8×
• Indiana Department of Transportation, Division of Railroads v. Overton
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1990-06-20· cited 8×