· 4/17/1888
J. S. Brown & Co. v. Lessing
Citations
- 70 Tex. 544
- 7 S.W. 783
- 1888 Tex. LEXIS 1038
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- affirming denial of an oral motion for a continuance owing to the absence of a witness made on the morning of trial
- affirming denial of an oral motion for a continuance owing to the absence of a witness made on the morning of trial
- specifically noting that failure to comply with the requirements of Rule 24.09 was sufficient grounds to deny a motion for continuance, stating that this was “particularly true where the factual basis for the motion was not a last minute or unexpected surprise”
- specifically noting that failure to comply with the requirements of Rule 24.09 was sufficient grounds to deny a motion for continuance, stating that this was \particularly true where the factual basis for the motion was not a last minute or unexpected surprise\
- specifically noting that failure to comply with the requirements of Rule 24.09 was sufficient grounds to deny a motion for continuance, stating that this was “particularly true where the factual basis for the motion was not a last minute or unexpected surprise”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Stayton
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.