Iverson v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “A determination of whether the defendant understood the nature of the charge will be made by using the totality of the circumstances approach, whether the facts are contained in the plea canvas [sic] or at other stages of the proceedings.”
• “A determination of whether the defendant understood the nature of the charge will be made by using the totality of the circumstances approach, whether the facts are contained in the plea canvas [sic] or at other stages of the pro- ceedings.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Christopher C. Little v. Jacqueline Crawford Frankie Sue Del Papa
  Ninth Circuit· 2006-06-08· cited 70×
• State v. Gomes
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1996-12-20· cited 17×
• Little v. Crawford
  Ninth Circuit· 2006-06-07

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Bearden v. Georgia
  Supreme Court· 1983-05-24· cited 1,941×
• Henderson v. Morgan
  Supreme Court· 1976-06-17· cited 1,382×
• Bryant v. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1986-06-26· cited 107×
• Koenig v. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1983-11-10· cited 30×
• Lizotte v. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1986-06-20· cited 6×
• DuBose v. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1984-06-26· cited 3×
• Elam v. Municipal Court of Oklahoma City
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1988-06-28· cited 2×