Eli Lilly & Company, an Indiana Corporation v. Natural Answers, Incorporated, a Florida Corporation, and Brian A. Feinstein

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that HERBRO-ZAC and PROZAC were “highly similar”
• finding that obvious wrongful intent can be weighed heavily in the overall analysis
• finding that “using another’s trademark in one’s metatags is much like posting a sign with another’s trademark in front of one’s store,” and that it is evidence of the intent to confuse
• stating the three most important factors one should look to in a likelihood of confusion case
• using the same similarity test for a dilution claim used for a related infringement claim
• stating the three most important factors one should look to in a likelihood of confusion case

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).