Interstate Northborough Partnership v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing when judgment turns on excluded evidence, exclusion of evidence is harmful
• stating appellate court reviews trial court = s decision to exclude evidence under an abuse of discretion standard of review
• “Whether to admit or exclude evidence is a matter committed to the trial court’s sound discretion.”
• error in admitting evidence is generally harmless if contested evidence is merely cumulative of properly admitted evidence
• “Typically, a successful challenge to a trial court’s evidentiary rulings requires the complaining party to demonstrate that the judgment turns on the particular evidence excluded or admitted.”
• “Typically, a successful challenge to a trial court’s evidentiary rulings requires the complaining party to demonstrate that the judgment turns on the particular evidence excluded or admitted.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).