Shedrick Chandler v. CSC Appied Technologies, L. L .C.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that to establish prima facie case of discrimination, plaintiff must show adverse employment action
• holding that exclusion of evidence generally does not constitute reversible error when excluded evidence is cumulative and not controlling on material issue dispositive to case
• holding no evidence of pretext in age discrimination case even though decisionmaker made age-related comments
• noting that evidence must raise fact issue regarding discrimination and concluding that stray comments and heavier workload were' insufficient to create fact issue
• finding “no evidence [plaintiff] engaged in the protected activity of complaining that he was not included [on trip list] because of his race and was then subsequently terminated”
• finding plaintiff presented “no evidence” that racially derogatory comments “were made close to the time of the adverse employment decision at issue” and thus could not support TCHRA claims

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).