Intellectual Ventures I LLC v. Checkpoint Software Technologies Ltd.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding this factor to slightly favor transfer, where the cost of local counsel in Delaware was the only consideration raised by the parties, and where the parties seemed financially capable of bearing the added expense
• “Nevertheless, as this Court has repeatedly recognized, ‘recent technological advances have reduced the weight of this factor to virtually nothing.’”
• “Nevertheless, as this Court has repeatedly recognized, ‘recent technological advances have reduced the weight of this factor to virtually nothing.’”
• “When transfer is sought by a defendant with operations on a national or international scale, that defendant must prove that litigating in Delaware would pose a unique or unusual burden on [its] operations.”
• acknowledging the “fact-specific, case-by-case nature of a [transfer] decision”
• finding other 1404(a) factors neutral

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).