Skip to main content
· 12/28/1993

Intel Corporation v. Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.

Citations

  • 12 F.3d 908
  • 93 Daily Journal DAR 16597
  • 29 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1363
  • 93 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9673
  • 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 33639
  • 1993 WL 532738

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[I]ssues which are not specifically and distinctly argued and raised 13 in a party’s opening brief are waived.”
  • “A district court may enter a Colorado River stay order only if it has ‘full 18 confidence’ that the parallel state proceeding will end the litigation.”
  • “Under the rules governing the Colorado River doctrine, the existence of a substantial 16 doubt as to whether the state proceedings will resolve the federal action precludes the granting of a 17 stay.”
  • Gulfstream Aerospace 5 Corp. v. Mayacamas Corp., 485 U.S. 271, 277 (1988)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Reinhardt, Leavy, Merhige

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.