RR Street & Co. Inc. v. Transport Ins. Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that state court’s “significant progress” toward resolution of dispute weighed against exercise of jurisdiction
• holding that, when reviewing a Colorado River stay, we consider only facts that were available to the district court
• concluding that the source of law factor is “neutral” where the complexity of the action “stems from the number of policies and insurers, not from the type of [state] law involved in the action”
• stating that courts should consider whether “entertaining a declaratory judgment action would create duplicative litigation.”
• holding the first factor “irrelevant in this case because the dispute does not involve a specific piece of property”
• observing that the “inconvenience” factor was irrelevant because “both the federal and state forums [were] located in [the same city]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).