Skip to main content
· 6/4/2014

Inre: Rambus, Inc.

Citations

  • 753 F.3d 1253
  • 111 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1077
  • 2014 WL 2487485
  • 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 10359

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • providing that, once a patent has expired, “we apply the Phillips claim construction standards”
  • reversing the Board's anticipation findings during reexamination based in part on our review of the prior art figures
  • “If, as is the case here, a reexamination involves the claims of an expired patent, a patentee is unable to make claim amendments . . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rader, Moore, Reyna

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.