Ingerman v. Moore

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the appellant had not shown Strickland prejudice from his counsel’s alleged failure to interview additional witnesses because the appellant “offered no evidence on this issue at the motion for new trial hearing”
• even if trial counsel's cross-examination of witness was deficient, ineffective assistance claim failed absent a showing of prejudice
• defendant did not show he was prejudiced by trial counsel’s failure to interview witness who repeated on cross-examination that victim feared the defendant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).