Skip to main content
· 5/14/1891

Paige v. Roeding

Citations

  • 89 Cal. 69
  • 26 P. 787
  • 1891 Cal. LEXIS 773

Syllabus

<p>Appeal—Dismissal — Omission op Part of Judgment Roll — Diminution of Record.—An appeal from a judgment will not be dismissed merely because some part of the judgment roll is omitted from the transcript, where it does not appear that the omitted parts are importante An omission, if deemed important, may be remedied by suggestion of a diminution of the record*</p>

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that “[a] knowing and willful misapplication of the law, of course, would amount to bad faith and thereby implicate the Code of Judicial Conduct”
  • establishing this Court’s authority to review advisory opinions from the Judicial Qualifications Commission

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McFarland

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.