Inge v. Procunier

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The scope of the relevant market is not governed by the presence of a price differential between competing products”
• applies Clayton 3 analysis to a contract challenged under Sherman 1; of course, greater showing of anti-competitive effect required under latter
• “A civil cause of action under the [antitrust acts] arises at each time the plaintiffs interest is invaded to his damage, and the statute of limitations begins to run at that time.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).