Incollingo v. McCarron

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding defendant’s assertions of witness convenience did not warrant transfer, but transfer appropriate based on, inter alia, “substantial backlog of civil cases” in Philadelphia courts (citations omitted)
• holding defendant’s assertions of witness convenience did not warrant transfer, but transfer appropriate based on, inter alia, “substantial backlog of civil cases” in Philadelphia courts (citations omitted)
• holding defendant’s assertions of witness convenience did not warrant transfer, but transfer appropriate based on, inter alia, “substantial backlog of civil cases” in Philadelphia courts (citations omitted)
• trial court properly recognized substantial backlog of Philadelphia trial courts in determining transfer petition under Rule 1006(d)
• trial court properly recognized substantial backlog of Philadelphia trial courts in determining transfer petition under Rule 1006(d)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).