Skip to main content

In the Interest of WRIGHT

Citations

  • 401 A.2d 1209
  • 265 Pa. Super. 278
  • 1979 Pa. Super. LEXIS 2039

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • deciding that “the fact that a person drinks does not impeach his credibility; evidence of drinking is admissible only because it lays a foundation for an opinion of the intoxication of the witness”
  • deciding that \the fact that a person drinks does not impeach his credibility; evidence of drinking is admissible only because it lays a foundation for an opinion of the intoxication of the witness\
  • court should have allowed questions regarding intoxication to impeach credibility where testimony on direct examination established that witness had been drinking
  • court should have allowed questions regarding intoxication to impeach credibility where testimony on direct examination established that witness had been drinking

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cercone, Wieand, Hoffman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.