Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Neiswonger

Citations

  • 488 A.2d 68
  • 338 Pa. Super. 625
  • 1985 Pa. Super. LEXIS 5623

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding testimony by non-experts on whether person is intoxicated is admissible
  • explaining officer may render opinion as to defendant’s state of intoxication
  • police officer who did not see defendant drive was competent to offer opinion regarding whether defendant had been intoxicated
  • officer may render opinion as to a defendant’s state of intoxication

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Spaeth, Brosky, Olszewski

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.