In re Y.F.
Citations
- 2024 Ohio 5604
Syllabus
Permanent custody; legal custody; best interest of child. Judgment reversed. The trial court erred in denying the agency's motion for permanent custody and granting Father's motion for legal custody to his parents. The manifest weight of the evidence supports a determination of permanent custody to the agency. The agency proved by clear and convincing evidence that the child cannot or should not be placed with either parent within a reasonable period of time. The agency further proved by clear and convincing evidence that granting permanent custody to the agency would be in the best interest of the child.
Judges: Ryan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Eastley v. VolkmanOhio Supreme Court· 2012-05-22· cited 2,407×
- In re Estate of HaynesOhio Supreme Court· 1986-07-23· cited 380×
- In re Z.C.Ohio Supreme Court· 2023-12-27· cited 335×
- In re L.W.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2017-02-23· cited 61×
- In re GlennOhio Court of Appeals· 2000-10-30· cited 33×
- In re D.H.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2021-10-28· cited 19×
- In re H.G.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2024-09-05· cited 10×
- In re B.D.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2017-11-22· cited 5×
- In re D.G.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2023-12-07· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.