In re D.G.
Citations
- 2023 Ohio 4427
Syllabus
Permanent custody child's wishes best interest of the child. Clear and convincing evidence supports the trial court's finding that the child cannot be placed with mother within a reasonable time or should not be placed with mother and that permanent custody is in the best interest of the child. Although there is a good relationship between mother and the child, the factors against a grant of permanent custody are outweighed by the factors in favor of it. This is the third time the child was in the agency's temporary custody due to mother's substance abuse, chronic lack of housing, and failure to meet his medical needs. The best interest of the child requires permanency and a safe and secure environment. Accordingly, the trial court's decision granting permanent custody is affirmed.
Judges: Sheehan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- In re HayesOhio Supreme Court· 1997-06-18· cited 613×
- In re SchaeferOhio Supreme Court· 2006-10-25· cited 400×
- In re K.H.Ohio Supreme Court· 2008-09-30· cited 255×
- In re N.B.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2015-01-29· cited 142×
- In re M.J.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2013-12-12· cited 49×
- In re T.H.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2014-07-03· cited 29×
- In re V.M.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2018-12-04· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.