In re Wrobel

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Simply committing all of one’s non-exempt assets and meeting the ‘projected disposable income’ test, does not compel a ruling . . . that a plan meets the good faith test of 11 U.S.C. § 1325(a)(3).”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In re Bradley
  D. Maine· 2017-02-10· cited 5×
• In re Wrobel
  W.D. New York· 2015-07-23· cited 4×

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• C. Russell Kelleran, Jr., Eighteen Mile Corporation v. Slavko Andrijevic, A/K/A Al Andrie
  Second Circuit· 1987-08-04· cited 168×
• Matter of Wiggles
  N.D. Georgia· 1980-11-22· cited 21×
• In Re Hawes
  E.D. Wisconsin· 1987-05-15· cited 13×
• In Re Hendricks
  M.D. Florida· 2000-03-28· cited 6×
• In re Wrobel
  W.D. New York· 2014-03-28· cited 5×
• In Re Graves
  W.D. Louisiana· 1982-04-13· cited 4×