In re Wrobel

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[T]he phrase ‘hinder, delay or defraud’ is a statutory whole, not to be parsed and severed to a point of absurdity.”
• “[T]he phrase ‘hinder, delay or defraud’ is a statutory whole, not to be parsed and severed to a point of absurdity.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In re Wrobel
  W.D. New York· 2015-02-13· cited 7×
• In re Wrobel
  W.D. New York· 2015-07-23· cited 4×

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Addison v. Seaver
  Eighth Circuit· 2008-08-07· cited 79×
• In Re Mark Scarpino, Debtor. Marine Midland Bank v. Mark Scarpino, Debtor-Appellee
  Second Circuit· 1997-05-13· cited 29×
• In Re Maronde
  D. Minnesota· 2005-11-08· cited 25×
• In re DeWolfe
  W.D. New York· 2013-06-19· cited 1×