In re Wright

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Absent any written description in the specification of quantitative values, arguments based on measurement of a drawing are of little value.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

18 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Nike, Inc. v. Adidas Ag
  Federal Circuit· 2016-02-11· cited 47×
• Plantronics, Inc. v. Aliph, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 2013-07-31· cited 45×
• Krippelz v. Ford Motor Co.
  Federal Circuit· 2012-01-27· cited 33×
• Ron Nystrom v. Trex Company, Inc. And Trex Company, LLC
  Federal Circuit· 2004-06-28· cited 25×
• In Re: Ethicon, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 2017-01-03· cited 24×
• In re Merchant
  Customs and Patent Appeals· 1978-05-11· cited 20×
• In re Burckel
  Customs and Patent Appeals· 1979-03-01· cited 17×
• Go Medical Industries Pty, Ltd. v. Inmed Corp.
  N.D. Georgia· 2003-07-09· cited 7×
• Minemyer v. B-Roc Representatives, Inc.
  N.D. Illinois· 2009-10-27· cited 7×
• Hockerson-Halberstadt, Inc. v. Avia Group International, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 2000-07-27· cited 5×
• Cacace v. Meyer Marketing (Macau Commercial Offshore) Co.
  S.D. New York· 2011-09-13· cited 2×
• Go Medical Industries Pty, Ltd v. Inmed Corporation (Doing Business as Rusch)
  Federal Circuit· 2006-10-27· cited 1×
• Nystrom v. Trex Company, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 2005-09-14· cited 1×
• TENNECO AUTO. OPERATING CO., INC. v. Visteon Corp.
  D. Delaware· 2005-06-28· cited 1×
• In Re Leonard R. Kahn
  Federal Circuit· 2006-03-22
• Iron Grip Barbell Company, Inc. v. USA Sports, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 2004-12-14
• Go Medical Industries Pty., Ltd. v. Inmed Corporation
  Federal Circuit· 2006-10-27
• In Re COUVARAS
  Federal Circuit· 2023-06-14