S.D. New York· 9/13/2006
In Re Worldcom, Inc.
Citations
- 352 B.R. 369
- 2006 Bankr. LEXIS 2118
- 47 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 16
- 2006 WL 2615534
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- considering plan and supplement to debtors’ disclosure statement together “to ascertain the meaning of Plan provisions”
- \The Court must interpret the provisions of [a Chapter 11 Plan] ... a task akin to interpreting a binding contract.\
- “The Court must interpret the provisions of [a Chapter 11 Plan] . . . a task akin to interpreting a binding contract.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Dla Piper Rudnick Gray Cary U.S. LLP
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Baeshen v. Arcapita Bank B.S.C.(c) (In re Arcapita Bank B.S.C.(c))S.D. New York· 2014-11-17· cited 19×
- Solus Alternative Asset Management LP v. Delphi Automotive PLC (In re DPH Holdings Corp.)S.D. New York· 2016-05-13· cited 12×
- In re AMR Corp.S.D. New York· 2016-12-23· cited 4×
- Friday Invs., LLC v. Bally Total Fitness of the Mid-Atlantic, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2017-08-01· cited 2×
- Indus. Fabricators, Inc. v. At-Net Servs. - Charlotte, Inc.North Carolina Business Court· 2018-05-09
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Blanchard v. BergeronSupreme Court· 1989-02-21· cited 1,609×
- Hall v. ColeSupreme Court· 1973-05-21· cited 1,138×
- F. D. Rich Co. v. United States Ex Rel. Industrial Lumber Co.Supreme Court· 1974-05-28· cited 1,056×
- Oliveri v. ThompsonSecond Circuit· 1986-10-15· cited 433×
- In Re Varat Enterprises, Inc., Debtor. First Union Commercial Corporation v. Nelson, Mullins, Riley and ScarboroughFirst Circuit· 1996-04-23· cited 370×
- Unnamed caseSecond Circuit· 1986-01-21· cited 235×
- In Re Augie/Restivo Baking Company, Ltd.Second Circuit· 1988-10-24· cited 80×
- In Re Sugarhouse Realty, Inc.E.D. Pennsylvania· 1996-01-17· cited 25×
- In Re Rickel & Associates, Inc.S.D. New York· 2001-04-12· cited 17×
- Rosenberg v. XO Communications, Inc. (In Re XO Communications, Inc.)S.D. New York· 2005-09-23· cited 11×
- Forman v. Mount Sinai Medical CenterS.D. New York· 1989-11-20· cited 8×
- In Re LJAK Associates, Inc.E.D. New York· 1994-03-16· cited 4×
- In Re Worldcom, Inc.S.D. New York· 2006-04-17· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.