Rosenberg v. XO Communications, Inc. (In Re XO Communications, Inc.)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• asserting that “the status of a debtor as a nominal defendant under [S]ection 362(a)(1)” and “a debtor’s interest in the potential proceeds from [a Section 16(b)] action” could warrant a stay

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).