In Re Wolf

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “both stating an ‘adequate nexus’ must exist between the claim and the subject property”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In Re Collins
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 2005-08-26· cited 44×
• Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. v. Howard
  Tex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2007-06-19· cited 38×
• Long Beach Mortgage Co. v. Evans
  Tex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 2009-06-17· cited 20×
• In Re Fitzmaurice
  Tex. App. Ct., 9th Dist. (Beaumont)· 2004-07-29· cited 10×
• in Re Burk Collins, Fountain Mall, Inc., and Mall Group, Ltd.
  Tex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2005-08-26
• Unnamed case
  Tex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2007-06-19
• Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. v. James A. Howard, Receiver for Tesher Corp.
  Tex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2007-06-19
• in Re Michael Fitzmaurice, 1488 Land Development, Inc., Live Oak Land Development, Ltd., L.O. Development, Inc., Dorothy Fitzmaurice, Sherry Fitzmaurice, B.J. Farley, and L. Don Knight
  Tex. App. Ct., 9th Dist. (Beaumont)· 2004-07-29
• in Re GMAC Mortgage Corporation
  Tex. App. Ct., 11th Dist. (Eastland)· 2006-03-16

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Flores v. Haberman
  Texas Supreme Court· 1996-03-07· cited 54×
• First National Petroleum Corp. v. Lloyd
  Tex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 1995-08-28· cited 29×
• Garza v. Pope
  Tex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 1997-04-30· cited 24×
• Teve Holdings Ltd. v. Jackson
  Tex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 1988-12-29· cited 24×
• Olbrich v. Touchy
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1989-11-16· cited 14×