Skip to main content

In Re Collins

Citations

  • 172 S.W.3d 287
  • 2005 Tex. App. LEXIS 6968
  • 2005 WL 2044856

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • comparing pleadings-only approach of this Court and Austin with the evidence-inclusive approach of Beaumont and Tyler, while noting Dallas has taken both approaches
  • comparing pleadings-only approach of this Court and Austin with the evidence-inclusive approach of Beaumont and Tyler, while noting Dallas has taken both approaches
  • “It is well settled that mandamus is the appropriate remedy when issues arise concerning the propriety of a notice of lis pendens.” (citations omitted)
  • analyzing live pleadings to determine real property claim status
  • “If . . . a motion seeking the removal of a lis pendens challenges the existence of facts supporting the pleader’s alleged interest in the property, the trial court should consider evidence relevant to the question of whether the alleged property interest is direct or collateral.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cayce, Gardner, Walker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

36 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.