Eighth Circuit· 6/26/1979
In Re Willis Donald Smith
Citations
- 600 F.2d 714
- 1979 U.S. App. LEXIS 13681
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- reversing the denial of IFP status as to the litigation expenses to a prisoner where the filing fee represented about 30% of the prisoner's account balance
- § 1915 \is designed to enable impecunious persons to present their claims in federal court\
- “We cannot endorse [any] interpretation or application of § 1915 that so rigidly employs the filing fee as a talisman which demarcates paupers from those considered to have funds sufficient to be able to pay it.”
- pauper status granted to prisoner with $65.85 in prison account
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Lay, Heaney, Ross
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Evans v. CroomFourth Circuit· 1981-06-04· cited 497×
- Temple v. EllerthorpeD. Rhode Island· 1984-05-23· cited 348×
- Danny Clark CROSS, Appellant, v. GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION, AppelleeEighth Circuit· 1983-11-18· cited 299×
- Carl D. Potnick v. Eastern State Hospital, Carl D. Potnick v. Suffolk PoliceSecond Circuit· 1983-02-28· cited 192×
- In Re Jewell WilliamsonEighth Circuit· 1986-03-31· cited 73×
- In Re Lawrence EppsSecond Circuit· 1989-11-01· cited 62×
- Ali v. CuylerE.D. Pennsylvania· 1982-09-14· cited 62×
- Benjamin Harrison Williams, Jr. v. Charlie Rhoden, Charles Tompkins, J. S. PadgettFifth Circuit· 1980-11-06· cited 29×
- Edom Williams v. Carl WhiteEighth Circuit· 1990-04-30· cited 28×
- Foust v. PearmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma· 1992-09-29· cited 22×
- State Ex Rel. Coats v. LewisMissouri Court of Appeals· 1985-04-09· cited 17×
- Henry L. McCONE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. HOLIDAY INN CONVENTION CENTER, Defendant-AppelleeTenth Circuit· 1986-07-22· cited 7×
- Vance v. District Court of Fremont CountyColorado Court of Appeals· 1995-11-24· cited 6×
- In Re PhillipsW.D. Virginia· 2007-08-20· cited 5×
- Jones v. RitterbuschW.D. Missouri· 1982-09-16· cited 4×
- Gale v. MooreW.D. Missouri· 1984-06-13· cited 4×
- Everett R. Lyon v. Del Vande KrolEighth Circuit· 1997-10-17· cited 3×
- Unnamed caseFourth Circuit· 1981-06-04· cited 1×
- Shore v. Pa. Dep't of Corr.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2018-01-18· cited 1×
- Beacom v. Veterans AdministrationW.D. Missouri· 1981-01-13· cited 1×
Cites
17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Adkins v. E. I. DuPont De Nemours & Co.Supreme Court· 1948-12-20· cited 3,220×
- Vincente Gatica Startti v. United StatesFifth Circuit· 1969-09-12· cited 143×
- Richard Venable v. William H. Meyers, Defendant-AppelleantNinth Circuit· 1974-07-16· cited 105×
- Kenneth Souder v. Michael McGuire Superintendent, Farview State Hospital, Waymart, PennsylvaniaThird Circuit· 1975-05-13· cited 84×
- Rhodes v. HoustonD. Nebraska· 1966-09-08· cited 40×
- Eugene Forester v. The California Adult AuthorityEighth Circuit· 1975-01-30· cited 38×
- Eisenberg v. Board of Wisconsin State Bar CommissionersSupreme Court· 1978-06-05· cited 37×
- Paul E. Rhodes v. Norval Houston, Paul E. Rhodes v. Clarence A. H. Meyer, Paul E. Rhodes v. Richard M. Van SteenbergEighth Circuit· 1969-12-04· cited 28×
- Albert H. Carter and Richard E. Chapman v. V. Bailey Thomas, Clerk, U.S. District Court, Etc.Fifth Circuit· 1976-03-05· cited 27×
- Ex parte TylerE.D. Missouri· 1975-12-05· cited 20×
- Carroll v. United StatesS.D. Texas· 1970-12-11· cited 18×
- Shimabuku v. BrittonD. Kansas· 1973-02-26· cited 18×
- Shimabuku v. BrittonTenth Circuit· 1974-09-10· cited 17×
- Ward v. WernerM.D. Pennsylvania· 1974-01-10· cited 16×
- Sejeck v. Singer Mfg. Co.D. New Jersey· 1953-07-06· cited 13×
- Tyler v. CallahanE.D. Missouri· 1977-04-07· cited 4×
- Tyler v. CallahanEighth Circuit· 1978-02-15· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.