Ali v. Cuyler

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• denying IFP because “plaintiff possessed 15 savings of $450 and the magistrate correctly determined that this amount was more than sufficient 16 to allow the plaintiff to pay the filing fee in this action.”
• IFP application denied because 28 the plaintiff possessed savings of $ 450 and that was more than sufficient to pay the $60 filing 1 fee
• IFP application denied because 25 the plaintiff possessed savings of $ 450 and that was more than sufficient to pay the $60 filing 26 fee
• IFP application denied because 22 the plaintiff possessed savings of $ 450 and that was more than sufficient to pay the filing fee
• IFP application denied because 19 the plaintiff possessed savings of $ 450 and that was more than sufficient to pay the $60 filing 20 fee
• IFP application denied because 27 the plaintiff possessed savings of $ 450 and that was more than sufficient to pay the filing fee

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).