In Re Wieboldt Stores, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that \[t]he fact that the transfer did not result from competitive bidding is [ ] not dispositive\ in determining whether a transaction constitutes a \sale\ under section 363 of the Bankruptcy Code
• applying Sax to find challenge to 363(f) “free and clear” provision moot

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Campbell v. Motors Liquidation Co.
  S.D. New York· 2010-04-13· cited 60×
• In re Cooper
  S.D. Illinois· 2018-09-22· cited 4×
• In re: Nashville Senior Living v.
  Sixth Circuit· 2009-06-11

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• In Re Samuel William SAX, Debtor, Appeal of THREE RIVERS MARINE SERVICE, INC.
  Seventh Circuit· 1986-07-22· cited 136×
• In Re Rock Industries MacHinery Corp., F/k/a Lippmann, Inc., Bankrupt. Appeal of Litton Systems, Inc
  Seventh Circuit· 1978-03-31· cited 117×
• Bankr. L. Rep. P 72,017 in Re the Charter Company, Debtors. Cargill, Incorporated, Atlantic Petroleum Corporation v. Charter International Oil Company
  Eleventh Circuit· 1987-10-13· cited 43×
• Ferrari v. Barclays American/Business Credit, Inc. (In Re Morse Tool, Inc.)
  D. Massachusetts· 1988-06-07· cited 14×
• Matter of Youngstown Steel Tank Co.
  W.D. Pennsylvania· 1983-02-17· cited 10×
• In re Andy Frain Services, Inc.
  Seventh Circuit· 1986-08-21· cited 9×
• Key Bank N.A. v. Internal Revenue Service (In Re Lake Placid Co.)
  W.D. Virginia· 1987-09-08· cited 6×
• In Re Pisces Leasing Corp.
  E.D. New York· 1986-11-05· cited 4×