In Re Samuel William SAX, Debtor, Appeal of THREE RIVERS MARINE SERVICE, INC.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that failure to obtain the stay required by S 363(m) moots question of whether bankruptcy court lacked authority to sell property that did not belong to the debtor's estate
• holding that failure to obtain the stay required by S 363(m) moots question of whether bankruptcy court lacked authority to sell property that did not belong to the debtor's estate
• holding that orders approving the sale of debtor’s property are final decisions
• finding appeal moot where no stay was entered pending appeal that alleged that bankruptcy court improperly authorized the sale of property that was not even part of the bankruptcy estate
• finding appeal moot where no stay was entered pending appeal that alleged that bankruptcy court improperly authorized the sale of property that was not even part of the bankruptcy estate
• “Without ... finality ... purchasers are likely to demand a steep discount for investing in the property.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).