In re Whitaker

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• according “some deference” to an interpretive rule that “do[es] not 3 require notice and comment”
• petitioner not entitled to proceed in forma pauperis in frivolous petition for damages of two dollars in allegedly illegal taxes as unfair burden in allocation of judicial resources
• petitioner not entitled to proceed in forma pauperis in frivolous petition for damages of two dollars in allegedly illegal taxes as unfair burden in allocation of judicial resources
• petitioner filed 23 claims for relief that had all been denied without dissent

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Melvin P. Deutsch v. United States
  Third Circuit· 1995-10-12· cited 687×
• Whitaker v. Superior Court of Cal., San Francisco Cty.
  Supreme Court· 1995-04-17· cited 64×
• State v. Silva
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2001-07-30· cited 42×
• Attwood v. Eighth Circuit Court
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-11-09· cited 19×
• In Re Maxton
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1996-11-27· cited 8×
• Lakes v. State
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1998-12-14· cited 7×
• United States v. Caicedo
  Fifth Circuit· 1997-06-02
• Patsy Montgomery v. State of Mississippi
  Mississippi Supreme Court· 2003-05-23
• Eloy Carl Cruz v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 7th Dist. (Amarillo)· 2004-12-16
• Thomas Arthur Entrekin v. Internal Medicine Associates of Dothan, P.A.
  Eleventh Circuit· 2012-08-09
• Parella, et al. v. RI Retirement Brd.
  D. New Hampshire· 1997-03-31

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• In re McDonald
  Supreme Court· 1989-02-21· cited 444×
• In Re Sindram
  Supreme Court· 1991-02-19· cited 308×
• In Re Anderson
  Supreme Court· 1994-05-02· cited 98×
• In Re Demos
  Supreme Court· 1991-04-29· cited 62×
• Day v. Day
  Supreme Court· 1993-10-12· cited 59×
• Talamini, Administratrix of the Estate of Talamini v. Allstate Insurance Co.
  Supreme Court· 1985-03-25· cited 37×
• In Re Amendment to Rule 39
  Supreme Court· 1991-05-13· cited 20×
• In re Whitaker
  Supreme Court· 1992-11-16· cited 4×
• In re Whitaker
  Supreme Court· 1994-05-23· cited 4×