Supreme Court· 5/2/1994
In Re Anderson
Citations
- 511 U.S. 364
- 114 S. Ct. 1606
- 128 L. Ed. 2d 332
- 1994 U.S. LEXIS 3299
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that filing fees are “assessed for the privilege of initiating an appeal”
- noting that “filing fees and attorney’s fees ... deter ... litigants from filing frivolous petitions”
- denying petitioner IFP status whenever seeking an extraordinary writ because petitioner’s twenty-two petitions and motions over three years were an abuse of the privilege
- instructing clerk not to accept Anderson’s petitions for extraordinary-writs unless he pays docketing fee
- forbidding abusive pro se litigant from bringing further extraordinary writs without prepayment of fees, but allowing him to continue to file in forma pauperis for other forms of relief
- denying the pro se petitioner’s request for leave to Plaintiff’s notes from the investigation before the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (See generally Dkt. No. 1, Attach. 1 at 10-16.
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Stevens, Blackmun
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
47 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Melvin P. Deutsch v. United StatesThird Circuit· 1995-10-12· cited 687×
- Support Systems International, Inc. v. Richard MackSeventh Circuit· 1995-01-11· cited 514×
- James Blakely v. Robert WardsFourth Circuit· 2013-10-21· cited 187×
- Clovis Carl Green., Jr. v. Honorable Edward W. Nottingham, District Judge Honorable Richard M. Borchers, Magistrate JudgeTenth Circuit· 1996-07-10· cited 162×
- Carr v. TillerySeventh Circuit· 2010-01-12· cited 160×
- United States of America, Ex Rel. Todd Verdone, Pro Per v. Circuit Court for Taylor County, in the Matter of Todd VerdoneSeventh Circuit· 1995-12-27· cited 100×
- Butler v. Department of JusticeD.C. Circuit· 2007-06-26· cited 65×
- Keith Thomas v. Eric Holder, Jr.D.C. Circuit· 2014-05-06· cited 51×
- Jerry Montgomery v. Cecil Davis, Larriante J. Sumbry v. Cecil DavisSeventh Circuit· 2004-03-30· cited 45×
- Jones v. Warden of the Stateville Correctional CenterN.D. Illinois· 1995-12-22· cited 23×
- In re WhitakerSupreme Court· 1994-10-11· cited 21×
- Anderson v. D.C. Public Defender ServiceDistrict of Columbia· 1995-03-07· cited 16×
- Dennis v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-12-18· cited 14×
- Henry v. United StatesSeventh Circuit· 2010-01-14· cited 14×
- Edwards v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-05-12· cited 12×
- Porter v. Dept. of the TreasuryThird Circuit· 2009-04-16· cited 9×
- In Re MaxtonSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1996-11-27· cited 8×
- Holmes v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-03-15· cited 7×
- Lakes v. StateCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1998-12-14· cited 7×
- Martin v. MarkoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-03-15· cited 6×
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- In re McDonaldSupreme Court· 1989-02-21· cited 444×
- In Re SindramSupreme Court· 1991-02-19· cited 308×
- In Re DemosSupreme Court· 1991-04-29· cited 62×
- Day v. DaySupreme Court· 1993-10-12· cited 59×
- In Re SassowerSupreme Court· 1993-10-12· cited 57×
- In Re Amendment to Rule 39Supreme Court· 1991-05-13· cited 20×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.