Supreme Court of South Carolina· 5/9/2011
In Re Wells
Citations
- 709 S.E.2d 644
- 392 S.C. 371
- 2011 S.C. LEXIS 170
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- imposing a $1,000 fine and publicly reprimanding a South Carolina-licensed attorney for numerous advertising violations, including Rule 7.1(a) (prohibiting material misrepresentations of fact and law), Rule 7.1(b
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Toal, Pleicones, Beatty, Kittredge, Hearn
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- In Re ThompsonSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2000-10-30· cited 39×
- In Re GreeneSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2006-12-04· cited 27×
- In Re HazzardSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2008-05-05· cited 18×
- In re WelchSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2003-07-28· cited 11×
- In Re SchmidtSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2007-07-09· cited 3×
- In Re Anonymous Member of the South Carolina BarSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2009-12-21· cited 3×
- Matter of PavilackSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1997-06-09· cited 2×
- In re CresonSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2000-01-10· cited 1×
- In re MitchellSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2005-06-06· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.