Supreme Court of South Carolina· 6/6/2005
In re Mitchell
Citations
- 364 S.C. 606
- 614 S.E.2d 634
- 2005 S.C. LEXIS 155
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding Public Reprimand was the appropriate sanction where attorney, who had previously received a letter of caution, continued to use letterhead that contained misleading information regarding his solo practice
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Burnett, Moore, Pleicones, Toal, Waller
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.